article

Scientific text or internet comments and their influence on pupils' opinions

Lucie Hlaváčová, Radka Holanová

information

volume: 33
year: 2024
issue: 2
fulltext: PDF

online publishing date: 9/10/2024
DOI: 10.14712/25337556.2024.2.2
ISSN (Online): 2533-7556

Licence Creative Commons
Toto dílo podléhá licenci Creative Commons Uveďte původ 4.0 Mezinárodní License.

abstract

The topic of the conducted research is the influence of discussion comments on the formation of the opinions of readers, respectively pupils, and on the nature of their subsequent reactions upon reading a presented scientific text. The research tool used is a form with the initial text of the media release and several subsequent discussion posts. The initial text deals with an ecological process, the trophic cascade, which is clarified using the example of the return of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and their impact on the entire ecosystem. However, within the discussion comments on the given text, four different versions of the form appear, differing only in the reactions of the discussion comments. The purpose of these differences is to find out whether the comments on the media's science communication have an influence on the formation of the opinion of the discussants and how they manifest themselves in the discussion. 309 pupils of lower and upper secondary education took part in the research. The results indicate that due to the occurrence of certain types of comments, pupils react in different ways in the discussion. For example, it turned out that in the case of comments appealing to the fear of wolves, the students also expressed certain fears about wolves significantly more often, but on the other hand, opinions expressing disagreement with the comments were also the most common. Uncovering certain influences of discussion comments makes it possible to respond appropriately and significantly contribute to the development of media literacy, and therefore also science literacy.


keywords

media education, critical thinking, science literacy, Yellowstone National Park, wolves

fulltext (PDF )

PDF

References

Bastick, Z. 2021. „Would You Notice if Fake News Changed Your Behavior? An Experiment on the Unconscious Effects of Disinformation.“ Computers in Human Behavior, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106633.

Bell, B. T., J. A. Cassarly, L. Dunbar. 2018. „Selfie-Objectification: Self-Objectification and Positive Feedback ("Likes") are Associated with Frequency of Posting Sexually Objectifying Self-Images on Social Media.“ Body Image, 26, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.06.005.

Brewer, P. R., M. Habegger, R. Harrington, L. H. Hoffman, P. E. Jones, J. L. Lambe. 2015. „Interactivity between Candidates and Citizens on a Social Networking Site: Effects on Perceptions and Vote Intentions.“ Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3 (1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2014.29.

Gil de Zúñiga, H., P. González-González, M. Goyanes. 2021. „Pathways to Political Persuasion: Linking Online, Social Media, and Fake News with Political Attitude Change through Political Discussion.“ American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221118272.

Gregor, M., P. Vejvodová. 2018. Nejlepší kniha o fake news!!!. Brno: CPress.

Holanová, R., L. Hlaváčová. 2023a. Vliv internetových diskuzních komentářů na vyjadřovací prostředky žáků. Didaktické studie, 15 (1), 119–136.

Holanová, R., L. Hlaváčová. 2023b. Recepce internetových diskuzních komentářů a její vliv na projevy kritického myšlení, mediální gramotnosti a vyjadřování emocí dětských čtenářů. O dieťati, jazyku a literatúře, Prešov 11 (2), 106–113.

Innes, M., H. Innes, C. Roberts, D. Harmston, D. Grinnell. 2021. „The Normalisation and Domestication of Digital Disinformation: on the Alignment and Consequences of Far-right and Russian State (Dis) Information Operations and Campaigns in Europe.“ Journal of Cyber Policy, 6 (1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2021.1937252.

Janoušková, S., V. Žák, M. Rusek. (2019). Koncept přírodovědné gramotnosti v České republice: analýza a porovnání. Studia paedagogica, 24 (3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2019-3-4.

Strauss, A., J. Corbinová. 1999. Základy kvalitativního výzkumu. Boskovice: Albert.

Švaříček, R., K. Šeďová. 2014. Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Praha: Portál.

Witte, K. 1992. „Putting the Fear Back into Fear Appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model.“ Communication Monographs, 59 (4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276.

Wollebæk, D., R. Karlsen, K. Steen-Johnsen, B. Enjolras. (2019). „Anger, Fear, and Echo Chambers: The Emotional Basis for Online Behavior.“ Social Media+ Society, 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119829859.


We use cookies to analyse our traffic. More information