IDEAS FOR EXPERIMENTS AND OBSERVATION OF AQUATIC ANIMALS IN SCHOOL AQUARIUM XXV (BREEDING OF FRESHWATER SPONGES (PORIFERA))
Sponges are mostly marine (over 9,000 species) or freshwater (about 100 species) invertebrates of the animal phylum Porifera. Sponges are multicellular organisms consisting of jelly-like mesohyl sandwiched between two thin layers of cells, and usually have tube-like bodies full of pores and channels that allow water to circulate through them. They do not have complex nervous, digestive or circulatory systems. Unlike other animals, they lack true tissues and organs. Many sponges have internal skeletons of spicules (skeletal-like fragments of calcium carbonate or silicon dioxide), and/or spongin (a modified type of collagen protein). Some sponges host photosynthesizing microorganisms such as endosymbionts, and these alliances often produce more food and oxygen than they consume. They are mostly filter feeders, but a few species of sponges that live in food-poor marine environments have evolved as carnivores that prey mainly on small crustaceans. All adult sponges are sessile, while their larval stage of life is motile. Most sponges reproduce sexually, but they can also reproduce asexually. When environmental conditions become less hospitable to the sponges, for example, as temperatures drop, many freshwater species, and a few of the marine ones, produce gemmules. Sponges and their microscopic endosymbionts are now being researched as possible sources of medicines for treating a wide range of diseases. This paper provides ideas for the observation of freshwater sponges in school aquaria.
school aquarium; freshwater sponges; Porifera, observation
Bertolino M., Reboa A., Armenio C., Castellano M., Felline S., Terlizzi A., Bavestrello G. (2024). Sponges as feeding resource for the white seabream Diplodus sargus (Linnaeus, 1758) from the Mediterranean Sea, The European Zoological Journal, 91: 2, 1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2024.2431084
Bonamonte D., Filoni A., Angelin P. V. G. (2016). Dermatitis caused by sponges, 121–126. In: Bonamonte D., Angelini G. (eds.): Aquatic dermatology,Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40615-2_7
Buchar J., Ducháč V., Hůrka K., Lellák J. (2005). Klíč k určování bezobratlých. Scientia Praha, 287 str.
Colin P. L. (1978). Marine Invertebrates and Plants of the Living Reef. T.F.H. Publications, 110–111.
Coppock A. G., Kingsford M., Jones G. P. (2024). Importance of complex sponges as habitat and feeding substrata for coral reef fishes. Marine Biology, 171, 154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-024-04467-6
Cruz A. A. V., Alencar V. M., Medina N. H., Volkmer-Ribeiro C., Gattás V. L., Luna E. (2013). Dangerous waters: outbreak of eye lesions caused by fresh water sponge spicules. Eye, 27, 3: 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.290
Fauna Tropica. https://www.faunatropica.eu/animals/fish/loricariidae/ancistrus-ranunculus-l34/
Girard E. B., Fuchs A., Kaliwoda M., Lasut M., Ploetz E., Schmal W. W., Wörheide G. (2021). Sponges as bioindicators for microparticulate pollutants. Environmental Pollution, 268, part A, 115851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115851
Häder D.-P. (2021). Chapter 18 – Marine sponges: source of novel biotechnological substances. Natural Bioactive Compounds, Technological Advancements, 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820655-3.00018-5
Hill M. S., Hill A. L. (2002). Freshwater sponges as indicators of water pollution: an investigative undergraduate lab, 385–389. In: O’Donnell M. A. (ed.): Tested studies for laboratory teaching, Proceedings of the 23rd Workshop/Conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE), 23, 392 pp.
Chidugu-Ogborigbo R. U., Sunday Nkopuyo U., Hodges Nikolas J., Barker J. (2025). Bioaccumulation and genotoxic effect of heavy metal pollution in marine sponges from the Niger Delta. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 211: 117386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117386
Isbister G. K., Hooper J. N. A. (2006). Clinical effects by sponges of the genus Tedania and a review of sponge stings worldwide. Toxicon 46, 7: 782–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.08.009
Lee W. L., Reiswig H., Austin W. C., Lundsten L. (2012). An extraordinary new carnivorous sponge Chondrocladia lyra, in the subgenus Symmetrocladia (Demospongiae, Cladorhizidae) from off of northern California, USA. Invertebrate Biology, 131, 4: 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12001
Lellák J., Kořínek V., Fott J., Kořínková J., Punčochář P. (1972). Biologie vodních živočichů. Skriptum, Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta přírodovědecká, SPN, 220 str.
Momin S., Heena M. (2025). Hydrobiological and microscopic investigation of the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri (Demospongiae) Lieberkühn, 1856, cultivated in a community fish tank. www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-5934035/v1.pdf
Motyčka V., Roller Z. (2004). Bezobratlí 1, Svět zvířat X. Albatros Praha, 172 str.
Muller S., Rapp Py-Daniel L. H., Zuanon J. (1994). Ancistrus ranunculus, a new species of loricariid fish (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the Xingú and Tocantins rivers, Brazil. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 5, 4: 289–296.
Paix B., van der Valk E. & de Voogd N. J. (2024). Dynamics, diversity, and roles of bacterial transmission modes during the first asexual life stages of the freshwater sponge Spongilla lacustris. Environmental Microbiome, 19, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-024-00580-7
Proks P. (1994). Defensive roles for secondary metabolites from marine sponges and sponge feeding nudibranchs. Toxicon, 32, 6: 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-0101(94)90334-4
Pronzato R., Manconi R. (1991). Colonization, life cycles and competition in a freshwater sponge associ ation. In: Reitner J., Keupp H. (eds.): Fossil and recent sponges. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75656-6_35
Rizzo C., Caruso G., Maimone G., Patrolecco L., Termine M., Bertolino M., Giannarelli S., Rappazzo A. C., Elster J., Lena A., Papale M., Pescatore T., Rauseo J., Soldano R., Spataro F., Aspholm P. E., Azzaro M., Lo Giudice A. (2025). Microbiome and pollutants in the freshwater sponges Ephydatia muelleri (Lieberkühn, 1856) and Spongilla lacustris (Linnaeus, 1758) from the sub-Arctic Pasvik river (Northern Fennoscandia). Environmental Research, 273, 121126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121126
Sedlák E. (2003). Zoologie bezobratlých. Skriptum, Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta, 338 s.
Sládeček V. (1980). Indicator value of freshwater Porifera. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 8, 3: 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1521-401X.1980.tb00032.x
Sugden S., Holert J., Cardenas E., Mohn W. W., Stein L. Y. (2022). Microbiome of the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri shares compositional and functional similarities with those of marine sponges. International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal, 16: 2503–2512.
Vacelet J., Boury-Esnault N. (1995). Carnivorous sponges. Nature, 373, 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/373333a0
Volkmer-Ribeiro C., Lenzi H. L., Oréfice F., Pelajo-Machado M., de Alencar L. M., Fonseca C. F., Batista T. C., Manso P. P., Coelho J., Machado M. (2006). Freshwater sponge spicules: a new agent of ocular pathology. Memórias de Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 101(8): 899–903. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762006000800013
Youssef D. T. A., Al Ommary M. M., Bashanfar B. M., Shaala L. A., Al Zughaibi T. A., Risinger A. L., Mooberry S. L. (2025). Latrunculin U a potent actin disrupter from the Red Sea marine sponge Negombata magnifica. Natural Product Research, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2025.2457599
Žáková Z., Opravilová V., Marvan P. (2005). Výskyt sladkovodních hub (Porifera: Spongillidae) a dalších organismů, které jsou na ně vázány, v soustavě nádrží Dalešice a Mohelno. Acta Rerum Naturalium, 1: 157–173.
https://geologie.vsb.cz/paleontologie/paleontologie/zoopaleontologie/Kmen%20Porifera.htm
https:// www.gymh.cz/vyuka/biologie/prehledy/3zoo_04_houbovci_zahavci.pdf