article

Subject Matter of Experiments and Observations of Water Animals in School Aquarium V (Keeping of Dragonfly Nymphs)

Lubomír Hanel

information

volume: 28
year: 2019
issue: 4
fulltext: PDF

online publishing date: 31/12/2019
DOI: 10.14712/25337556.2019.4.4
ISSN (Online): 2533-7556

Licence Creative Commons
Toto dílo podléhá licenci Creative Commons Uveďte původ 4.0 Mezinárodní License.

abstract

Dragonflies are an example of a hemimetabolous insect with three distinct stages: the egg, the nymph and the adult stage, or imago. The pupal stage is absent. All dragonfly nymphs are fierce and voracious predators. They kill and eat any animal of their own size that they can catch, including various water invertebrates, tadpoles and fish. Their hunting methods can vary. Some nymphs are active hunters. The use their camouflage and move slowly to be inconspicuous. Other nymphs are sedentary, spending their time buried in mud or hiding in algae mats or other vegetation. The nymphs catch their prey using highly modified lower lips known as labium. During the final nymph stage, it begins to develop adult wings, although they remain tucked inside wing pads. The closer to adulthood the nymph is, the fuller the wing pads appear. When it is finally ready, the larva crawls out of the water for its last molt. Dragonfly nymphs can easily survive in aquarium tanks. Some experiments on, and observations of, dragonfly nymphs in an aquarium, inspired by cited literature sources are presented in this contribution (e.g., prey selection, effect of space on the feeding efficiency of a dragonfly nymph, influence of temperature on mosquito larvae predation, success rate of hunting, and observation of final metamorphosis).


keywords

dragonflies, nymphs, school aquarium, keeping

fulltext (PDF )

PDF

References

Andrew R. J., Patankar N. 2010: The process of moulting during final emergence of the dragonfly Pantala flavescens (Fabricius) (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 39(2): 127-134.

Bergelson J. M. 1985: A Mechanistic Interpretation of Prey Selection by Anax junius Larvae (Odonata: Aeschnidae). Ecology 66,6: 1699-1705. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937365

Blois C., Cloarec A. 2010: Influence of Experience on Prey Selection by Anax imperator Larvae (Aeschnidae‐Odonata). Ethology 68(4): 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1985.tb00131.x

Corbet P. S. 1999: Dragonflies: behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Harley, Colchester.

Dolný A., Bárta D., Waldhauser M., Holuša O., Hanel L. 2007: Vážky České republiky. Ekologie, ochrana a rozšíření. 672 s.

Dolný A., Bárta D., Harabiš F. 2016: Vážky (Insecta: Odonata) České republiky. Academia, Praha. 344 s.

Garten, C. T. Jr., Gentry J. B. 1976: Thermal Tolerance of Dragonfly Nymphs. II. Comparison of Nymphs from Control and Thermally Altered Environments. Physiological Zoology, 49, 2: 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.49.2.30152541

Hanel L. 1994: Vážky v akváriu. Akvárium terárium, 9: 16-18.

Hanel L. 2000: Vážky, 71-93. In: Kovařík F. a kol.: Hmyz, chov, morfologie. Nakladatelství Madagaskar, Jihlava, 296 s.

Hanel L. 2017: Náměty na pokusy a pozorování vodních živočichů ve školním akváriu (I, pohyb živočichů). Biologie, chemie, zeměpis, 26, 4: 38-51. https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2017.4.4

Hanel L. 2018: Náměty na pokusy a pozorování vodních živočichů ve školním akváriu II (dýchání vodních živočichů). Biologie, chemie, zeměpis, 2: 11-21. https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2018.2.2

Hanel L. 2018: Náměty na pokusy a pozorování vodních živočichů ve školním akváriu III (potravní chování vodních živočichů). Biologie, chemie, zeměpis, 4: 19-29. https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2018.4.3

Chovanec A. 1992: The influence of tadpole swimming behavior on predation by dragonfly nymphs. Amphibia-Reptilia 13(4): 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853892X00049

Janda V. 1909: XXI. O regeneračních dějích u členovců. Část II. (Odonata) Věst. král. české spol. nauk, 21: 1-36.

Kohl S. 2003: Klíč k určování exuvií evropských druhů vážek (Odonata) podřádu Anisoptera. ZO ČSOP Vlašim, 29 s.

Mandal S. K., Ghosh A., Bhattacharjee I., Chandra G. 2008: Biocontrol efficiency of odonate nymphs against larvae of the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus Say, 1823. Aqua Tropica, 106,2: 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.02.002

Novák K. a kol. 1969: Metody sběru a preparace hmyzu. Academia, Praha, 244 s.

Pandian T. J., Mathavan S. & Jeyagopal C. P. 1979: Influence of temperature and body weight on mosquito predation by the dragonfly nymph Mesogomphus lineatus, Hydrobiologia (1979) 62: 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037502

Pritchard G. 1964: The prey of dragonfly larvae (Odonata; Anisoptera) in ponds in Northern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1964, 42(5): 785-800. https://doi.org/10.1139/z64-076

Růžička J. 1968: Chov vážky lesklice kovové z vajíček. Živa 2: 63

Saha N., Aditya G., Banerjee S., Saha G. T. Predation potential of odonates on mosquito larvae: Implications for biological control. Biological Control 63,1: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.05.004

Singh R. K., Dhiman R. C., Singh F. 2003: Laboratory Studies on the Predatory Potential of Dragon-Fly Nymphs on Mosquito Larvae. The Journal of communicable diseases 35(2): 96-101. Dostupné na:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8164335_Laboratory_studies_on_the_predatory_potential_of_dragon-fly_nymphs_on_mosquito_larvae

Šigutová H., Šigut M., Dolný A. 2018: Phenotypic plasticity in specialists: How long-spined larval Sympetrum depressiusculum (Odonata: Libellulidae) responds to combined predator cues. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0201406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201406

Teyrovský V. 1922: Schopnost vnímati tvar u larev šídel (Aeschnidae). Spisy vydávané Přírodovědeckou fakultou Masarykovy university, Brno, 9: 1-16.

Varshini R. A., Kanagappan M. 2015: Effect of space on the feeding efficiency of dragonfly nymph Bradynopyga geminata. European Journal of Biotechnology and Bioscience, 3,12: 6-10.

Verdonschot R. C. M., Peeters E. T. H. M. 2012: Preference of larvae of Enallagma cyathigerum (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) for habitats of varying structural complexity. Eur. J. Entomol. 109 (2): 229-234, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2012.030

Younes A., El-Sherif H., Gawish F., Mahmoud M. 2015: Potential of Hemianax ephippiger (Odonata-Aeshnidae) nymph as predator of Fasciola intermediate host, Lymnaea natalensis. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 5, 8: 671-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.04.008

Younes A., El-Sherief H., Gawish F., Mahmoud M. 2016: Experimental evaluation of Odonata nymph in the biocontrol of schistosomiasis. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 6(12): 995-1000 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.10.006

Waldhauser M., Černý M. 2014: Vážky České republiky. ČSOP Vlašim, 188 s.

Zelený J. 1968: Odonata – Vážky, 66-68. In: Skuhravý V. a kol 1968: Metody chovu hmyzu. Academia, Praha 288 s.


We use cookies to analyse our traffic. More information