Model Representation of Cooperative Teaching Approach Via “The Sources of Hydrocarbons” Topic

Radoslava Karpeľová, Zuzana Haláková


volume: 30
year: 2021
issue: 1
fulltext: PDF

online publishing date: 24/3/2021
DOI: 10.14712/25337556.2021.1.1
ISSN (Online): 2533-7556

Licence Creative Commons
Toto dílo podléhá licenci Creative Commons Uveďte původ 4.0 Mezinárodní License.


Nowadays, many teachers try to add cooperative teaching and learning to common and non-traditional lessons. This approach is realizable in various science topics or in parts of them. There are several basic principles of cooperative learning: positive dependence on others, individual responsibility, interaction, social relationships, and working in groups. In this contribution, a possibility for applying and organizing this approach in the topic “The Sources of Carbohydrates” (characteristics, mining, utilization, fossil fuels, impact on the environment) for 9th grade pupils at primary schools or for 4th grade pupils at eight-year secondary schools is outlined. We have selected three teaching and learning methods according to the content which support cooperative learning during different phases of a chemistry lesson: method of association, snowballing, and the Six Thinking Hats method. It is possible to develop many of the pupils’ key competencies: to educate them how to be responsible for their own knowledge and the process of learning, help them become more self-confident, develop argumentation skills, teach them to listen to others’ views and see a problem from a different point of view, and how to learn and work in pairs or in small groups. In each example, the theoretical background of the method, the topic appropriate for realization, and the instructions for concrete performance during the lesson are provided.


cooperative learning, method of association, snowballing, Six Thinking Hats method, sources of carbohydrates

fulltext (PDF )



ACAR, B. & TARHAN, L. (2007). Effect of Cooperative Learning Strategies on Students‘ Understanding of Concepts in Electrochemistry. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 5, 349-373.

ACAR, B. & TARHAN, L. (2008). Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students‘ Understanding of Metallic Bonding. Res. Sci. Educ. 38, 401–420.

AITHAL, P. S. & KUMAR, P. M. S. (2017). Ideal Analysis for Decision Making in Critical Situation through Six Thinking Hats Method. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Managment 1(2), 1–9.

ANDERSON, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. Handbook of research on science education. pp. 807–830.

BODNER, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education. 63 (10), 873.

BRATT, C. (2008). The jigsaw classroom under test: no effect on intergroup relations evident. J. Comm. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 18, 403–419.

ČAPEK, R. (2018). Moderní didaktika. Praha: Grada, 624 s. ISBN 978-80-247-3450-7.

EILKS, I. & BYERS, B. (2010). The need for innovative methods of teaching and learning chemistry in higher education-reflections from a project of the European Chemistry Thematic Network. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 11(4), 233-240.

GAHR, A. A. (2003). Cooperative chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching; 32 (5), 311.

HEMRAJ-BENNY, T. & BECKFORD, I. (2014). Cooperative and Inquiry-Based Learning Utilizing Art-Related Topics: Teaching Chemistry to Community College Nonscience Majors J. Chem. Educ. 91 (10), 1618–1622.

JOHNSON, D. W. & JOHNSON, R. T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

KAGAN, S. (1989). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership. 47(4), 12–15.

KARACOP, A., & DOYMUS, K. (2013). Effects of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning and Animation Techniques on Students‘ Understanding of Chemical Bonding and Their Conceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 22, 186–203.

KLOOSTER, D. J., STEELE, J. L. & BLOOME, P. L. (2001). Ideas without boundaries: International education reform through reading and writing for critical thinking. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

KRULL, E. (2000). Pedagoogilise psühholoogia käsiraamat. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

LAFONT, L., PROERES, M. & VALLET, C. (2007). Cooperative group learning in a team game: role of verbal exchanges among peers. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 10, 93–113.

LAGO, R. G. M. & NAWANG, A. A. (2007) Influence of Cooperative Learning on Chemistry Students‘ Achievement, Self-efficacy and Attitude. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research. 5 (1), 209-223.

LI, M. P. & LAM, B. H. (2013). Cooperative learning. The Active Classroom, The Hong Kong Institude of Education.

LIN, E. (2006). Cooperative learning in the science classroom: A new learning model for a new year. The SciencenTeacher. 34–39.

PANITZ, T. (1999). Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning.

PITH, S.; LEHISTE, P.; RAUS, R. & LAZZAREU, M. (2012). The relevance of evocation and reflection cards in the learning process. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 41, 61–74.

PRATT, S. (2003). Cooperative learning strategies. The Science Teacher; 70 (4); 25.

SILVER, H. F. (1996). Teaching styles and strategies: Interventions to enrich instructional decision-making. Thoughtful Education Press.

TAŞDEMIR, M.; TAŞDEMIR, A. & YILDIRIM, K. (2009). Influence of portfolio evaluation in cooperative learning on student success. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education. 5 (1), 53–66.

THURSTON, A., TOPPING, K.J., TOLMIE, A., CHRISTIE, D., KARAGIANNIDOU, E. & MURRAY, P. (2010). Cooperative learning in science: follow-up from primary to high school. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 32 (4), 501-522.

VALDEZ, A. V., LOMOLJO, A., DUMRANG, S. P. & DIDATA, M. M. (2015). Developing Critical Thinking through Activity -Based and Cooperative Learning Approach in Teaching High School Chemistry. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5 (1), 139–141.

WAHYNUI, S. (2013). The use of snowballing strategy on teaching reading literary text (short stories). Language Circle Journal of Language and Literature. 7, 53–63.

WACHANGA, S. W. & MWANG, J. G. (2004). Effects of the Cooperative Class Experiment Teaching Method on Secondary School Students‘ Chemistry Achievement in Kenya‘s Nakuru District, International Education Journal. 5 (1), 26–36.

WARFA, A-R., M. (2016). Using Cooperative Learning To Teach Chemistry: A Meta-analytic Review, J. Chem. Educ. 93 (2), 248-255.

We use cookies to analyse our traffic. More information